顯示具有 art 標籤的文章。 顯示所有文章
顯示具有 art 標籤的文章。 顯示所有文章

2014年3月10日 星期一

一個藝術館四個展覽

之前還在說這個藝術館冇野睇,今日一去就睇左四個展覽。仲要四個都其實幾唔錯(作品-wise)。

1.Ju Ming's Sculpting the Living World exhibition at Hong Kong Museum of Art
朱銘雕塑大展:刻畫人間

主要當然是為了看這個展覽才去藝術館,作品很多,所以都算得上是a must-see exhibition! 比較喜歡《囚》和《立方體》這兩組較 哲學性的作品,被安排展在另一個館也是正確的,看這樣的作品需要一些空間。不過有點擠,場地太小,set-up又太小學雞,thought the exhibition deserves to be taken more seriously。




2. Hong Kong Contemporary Art Awards 2012
香港當代藝術獎2012

藝術館少見的contemporary art exhibition,但點解2012的獎到依家先展?2014喇喎大佬!當代藝術呀,慢一步都不能!



3. A Journey into Chinese Painting
畫遊記﹣虛白齋藏畫展

常設展,也是我以前唔肯入藝術館的原因之一。今日再睇,發現都有不少正野,但係個場地真係超級核突,總之好核突啦,好嬲呀!




4. Wan Qingli's Collection of Chinese Art Given by His Teachers and Friends
存念:萬青屴珍藏師友饋贈書籍印

這是四個展覽之中我最喜歡的,totally unexpected! 原本仲諗住唔上四樓睇喇,見仲有少少時間順便睇埋,先知呢個好野。未發現是大師級的作品之前只是覺得咁多contemporary Chinese ink嘅?係我鍾意的style喎!嘩,黄永玉、李可染,咩來頭呀?睇埋個curatorial statement,更覺不得了!很喜歡「存念」這個concept,雖然這些作品市場上肯定價值連城,但又回到中國藝術史,作品是用來互相交流的,我覺得這個展覽deliver到這個訊息!





臨走前去museum shop逛了一趟,發現跟以前很不同,原來換了另一間。賣的東西不多,但又幾精喎,主打Chinese art,所以不像以前那麼「立雜」,最開心係發現很多很專的書!看來在年尾閉館之前要多點過來(愚公移書)了!





2014年3月6日 星期四

台北國立故宮博物院

說來慚愧,去過這麼多次台北,又講到自己對藝術幾咁有興趣,卻從來沒有去過台北故宮。

唔鍾意睇中國書畫囉,冇架,我淨係睇western art or Chinese contemporary art架咋!所以香港果個爛鬼藝術館都好少去!(What a snob!)

世界是圓的,人總會隨著時間而改變,尤其是性格和喜好。讀了這個中國書畫歷史課之後,對書畫忽然很好奇。這次去台北由於住得很近所以順道去了故宮一趟,發現了很多寶物!聽說這些藏品數量之多就算每三個月換一次展品也要十一年才展得完!而且光是這個故宮博物院的歷史就已經夠有趣,甚至想去埋北京那個比較一下。

看了一個半小時,完全不夠,很多大陸團,又嘈(很多工作人員就是負責舉住個「請保持安靜」嘅牌行來行去…完全滴汗),又要排長龍,還來不及在最impress我的museum shop買東西呀!明明有幾本書很想買,明知香港很難找得到。

Didn't realize it's worth making a trip to Taipei just for the museum!

其實我又不是太喜歡吃,但點解我會為左食野而去台北而唔係為左睇這些國寶?

Will be back for sure!


黄公望 《富春山居圖》(無用師卷)

(第一次寫中文交功課)


黄公望的作品《富春山居圖》(無用師卷)繪於元朝,是一幅描繪中國浙江省富春山居景色的水墨畫卷。

要欣賞中國畫,首先必須摒棄一向用來欣賞西洋畫的準則。西洋畫講求的立體和空間感是基於他們對物件外在像真度的追求和對觀者位置的假設。畫家透過色彩深淺的變化創造立體感,並以單一固定角度安排觀者觀看畫作的位置。用相同的準則評論截然不同的中國畫並不正確。

品評中國古畫作品的標準和主要美學的原則,早從南齊已有謝赫的六法[1]:「一、氣韻生動,二、骨法用筆,三、應物象形,四、隨類賦彩,五、經營位置,六、傳移模寫。」

在黄公望的《富春山居圖》(無用師卷)中,描繪了富春鄉連綿的山脈、交錯的林木、恬靜的河流,仔細近看還有小橋、房舍、漁船等等。雖然都是靜物,但所謂「氣韻生動」,還是要看一幅畫整體來說畫家能否表現出自然、生動的感覺。

黄公望以大量的披麻皴和飛白筆觸展現出山脈的豐厚質感及石的紋理,遠方的山景則以渲染來呈現。用墨方面,乾、濕、濃、淡交替運用。以下圖的部份為例,正中央的山紋為乾淡;後方用渲染手法描繪的遠山為濕淡;左下方樹幹上的分明樹葉為乾濃;左中方較模糊的樹叢為濕濃。黄公望採用了不同的筆觸、技法,為這些靜態的山石加上變化,增添觀看的趣味。


橫向的長卷軸使觀者隨著畫面上連續的山水遊歷富春山居之間。平遠處可見有一人正在過橋,觀者看這人,彷似置身畫內,想像畫中之人看見的景色。卷軸左方和中央的兩座大山為高遠,觀者就像站在遠方仰望著這些高山。後方深遠處的山,更提示着我們這山間景色是如何壯觀。


畫面大概有一半部分是留白,佈白的位置主要是呈現天空和河流。豐富的山居景色之間採用了大量留白,很有平衡、令人舒服不會喘不過氣的效果。 以下圖的部分為例,留白的地方比着墨的還要多,但因為山間的描繪非常細緻,畫面內又有中、高、遠景,整體的感覺還是很生動有趣,不會覺得空洞乏味。


畫的前段及末端有不少題跋,包括其他畫家如沈周及董其昌,有的評畫有的記事;還有乾隆、嘉慶等等的印鑑。証明中國畫是一個思想交流的平台,觀者也是作品的一部分。




資料來源

1.      國立故宮博物院網頁  http://www.npm.gov.tw/zh-TW/Article.aspx?sNo=04000975

2.      國立故宮博物院書畫數位典藏資料檢索  http://painting.npm.gov.tw/npm_public/System/View.jsp?type=1&ObjectID=3301

3.      維基百科  http://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/富春山居图






[1]南齊謝赫於著作《古畫品錄》中提出的中國繪畫六法。



Lee Kit, You

Lee Kit's Venice biennale exhibition in Hong Kong
Join us this Saturday (March 8) at 2pm for a walkthrough with Lars Nittve and Lee Kit to find out how ‘You.’ was realized for the Hong Kong context.

Limited space, please arrive early to avoid disappointment.

Lars Nittve and Lee Kit (in English)
8 March (Saturday) 2:00pm

Yung Ma (In Cantonese)
15 March (Saturday) 4:00pm
 
Please visit www.westkowloon.hk/you for more information about ‘You.’

本週六 (3月8日) 下午2時,在李立偉及李傑的解說下觀賞展覽,從中更深入了解「你。」是如何在香港呈現。

藝術家及策展人現場導賞名額有限,敬請提早到場。

李立偉及李傑 (以英語進行)
3月8日 (星期六) 下午2時

馬容元 (以粵語進行)
3月15日 (星期六) 下午4時
 
詳情請瀏覽「你。」的網頁 www.westkowloon.hk/you

Time Traveller, at Espace Louis Vuitton

Another interesting exhibition

Aelita Andre

Really amazing little artist! She's only seven and started painting at the age of two! Had a really interesting discussion with her parents about education system at the Asia Hotel Art Fair yesterday! 

http://www.aelitaandre.com/



2014年2月20日 星期四

中國藝術

其實我都一直都覺得中國書畫很悶,顏色又齋題材又窄,點及西洋畫好睇呢?所以雖然踏咗隻腳入藝術界,但從沒興趣研究中國藝術。

直至最近讀一個中國書畫課程,遇到一位超有熱誠的老師,才有所改觀。一開始講到中國歷史,原來同學們連幾個主要朝代的先後次序都搞不清,真失禮。

還未算得上喜歡,只是覺得,身為中國人,對短短幾百年的西洋藝術史咁有興趣,點可以對我們的幾千年文化完全一無所知呢?

想試下畫國畫。個人亦很喜歡趙無極,希望從中國山水畫中學懂欣賞所謂的「氣」。

中法這個組合,我覺得非常優雅。


另一位中國旅法畫家吳冠中的作品也是我喜歡的風格。


還有朱德群。


兩個文化的完美結合。



2014年1月5日 星期日

Distilling Senses: A Journey through Art and Technology in AsianContemporary Art

Distilling Senses: A Journey through Art and Technology in Asian Contemporary Art 

Hong Kong Arts Centre
11/12/2013-12/01/2014

http://www.hkac.org.hk/en/calendar.php?id=1289


2013年12月26日 星期四

Art Stories - Assignment 2


Crucifixion of Jesus
According to the Christian gospels[1], Jesus, who is believed to be the Son of God and the Messiah, entered Gethsemane in Jerusalem with his disciples (the “Twelve Apostles”) in 1AD.  Shortly after the Last Supper, Judas (one of the disciples) identified Jesus to the Roman soldiers by means of a kiss and Jesus was arrested since he was seen as a threat to the authority.  Jesus was tried and sentenced to be scourged and crucified.  Mocked by the Roman soldiers as the “King of the Jews” and crowned with thorns, Jesus carried the cross for his crucifixion where he was nailed to the cross and crucified to death.  Following his death, Jesus’ body was taken down from the cross and buried in a tomb.  On the third day, he rose from the dead and returned to life.

Raphael’s The Mond Crucifixion

Raphael (Raffaello Sanzio da Urbino)
The Mond Crucifixion
c.1502-3
Oil on poplar
283.3x167.3cm
High Renaissance
National Gallery, London
 
The Mond Crucifixion was an early work of Raphael’s and was served as an altarpiece in the church of San Domenico in Città di Castello, near Raphael’s hometown Urbino in Italy.  The painting was commissioned by a merchant[2] for a chapel dedicated to Saint Jerome and is named after its last owner Ludwig Mond who bequeathed it to the National Gallery in London.  In the painting, Jesus was being crucified, with two angels by his sides catching his blood in chalices.  On the left side of the painting, Saint Jerome and Virgin Mary were shown kneeling and standing beside Jesus whilst Mary Magdalene and John the Evangelist were shown kneeling and standing on the right side of the painting. The inscription on the cross, I.N.R.I., is a Latin abbreviation of Iesus Nazarenus Rex Iudaeorum which translates to Jesus of Nazareth, King of the Jews.
The painting was greatly influenced by Raphael’s master, Perugino.  Like his master’s works, Raphael’s work was highly finished.  This can be seen in the perfect lines of the cross and the details in the characters’ expressions and clothing draperies.  Depth was created by the light and dark contrast as seen in the characters’ and landscape’s shadows and the use of aerial perspective created an illusion that the landscape is far away from the viewer.  However, differing to his master, Raphael’s painting represented a sense of harmony through a balanced, symmetric composition and the use of vibrant yet calming colours. The left and right sides of the cross are almost perfectly symmetrical, with the vertical space on the sides filled with the sun and the moon, the angels, and the standing and kneeling characters.  Different tones of blue are used in the painting, signifying divinity.  Red, the colour of blood, is present is every character, representing redemption through Jesus’ death.  Although the subject matter was death, the peaceful expression and gestures of the characters and the graceful movements of the angels portrayed a feeling of serenity.  Raphael has wisely used these elements to render the painting a suitable altarpiece specifically used for the Mass.
Raphael’s painting represented the perfect unity of form and content, which is a distinctive feature of High Renaissance art.  The symmetrical and balanced compositions representing harmony and stability established the classical ideal of beauty for centuries.

Crucifixion Scene by Other Artists

Another painting of the same subject matter is Fra Angelico’s Crucifixion with the Virgin, John the Evangelist, and Mary Magdelene.  The same story of Jesus being crucified and Virgin Mary, John the Evangelist and Mary Magdalene mourning by the cross is depicted truthfully albeit in its simplicity.  The background scenery is omitted as the focus is on the great act of Jesus’ sacrifice.   Strong emotions are represented by Jesus’ agonising posture and spilling blood and the characters mournful body language and facial expressions.
Fra Angelico’s painting style is marked by beauty and grace, delicate line-work and soft colouring[3].  Balance is again achieved by the largely symmetrical composition, similar to Raphael’s.  Colour choice was careful so that it does not disturb the sacredness of the painting.  In Fra Angelico’s painting depth is not apparent, although the artist did attempt to create perspective by using a darker tone at the further end of the floor.  Space is created by outline instead of chiaroscuro.  Except for the shadows in the drapery there is no clear light and dark contrast.  Holiness is represented by the colour of gold and the solid halos around the heads of the characters, a pictorial depiction often used by artists from pre-Renaissance time.  As the study of perspective was not fully developed during early Renaissance, Fra Angelico’s painting appears to be more flat when compared to Raphael’s. 
In Dali’s Christ of Saint John of the Cross, the subject matter is again crucifixion of Jesus.  Yet the feeling it gives is completely different from Raphael’s and Fra Angelico’s painting.  In Dali’s painting, biblical scenes are not truthfully represented - nails, crown of thorns, blood or wounds and the inscription of “I.N.R.I.”, which are typical in most crucifixion paintings, are all absent, there was also no sign of Virgin Mary, John the Evangelist, Mary Magdelene by the cross.  Only Jesus, whose face is not visible, was hanging on a cross with a darkened background, beneath the cross there is a seascape with a boat and fishermen. 
The painting is painted with a high degree of details yet it is so surreal because the top part and the bottom part of the painting were painted in absurdly different viewpoints – the crucifixion scene from above the cross (inspired by a crucifixion sketch by St. John of the Cross, shown on the left), where viewer is almost viewing the crucifixion from the point of view of God, and the seascape at eye level.  The composition of the crucifixion scene is on a triangle (the cross) and a circle (Jesus’ head) is Dali’s representation of the Trinity and Unity.
The use of dark and narrow range of colours, the depth created by the linear perspective of the cross, the strong light and dark contrast (chiaroscuro) on Jesus’ body and the theatrical posture of Jesus together give a dramatic, stage-like feeling to the top part of the painting.  The huge contrast between the top and bottom parts of the painting leave viewers wonder what is in the mind of the artist.  Dali explained that his inspiration came from a dream[4].  The movement of Surrealism was strongly influenced by psychoanalyst Sigmond Freud’s work on the Interpretation of dreams. By mixing surprising and incoherent fragments of the real world painted with detailed accuracy, Dali gives viewers the haunting feeling that there must be some sense in this apparent madness[5].  Post-modern artists are no longer aspiring to paint a scene or character truthfully as they are seen; they are also expressing themselves and their inner worlds at an emotional level through the painting.

Modern Application in Hong Kong
Since the crucifixion of Jesus, the cross has become a key element of Christian symbolism[6]. It is seen by Christian as a symbol of faith, salvation and atonement.
Crosses can be found in almost every church.   Inside the Hong Kong Catholic Cathedral of the Immaculate Conception in Central, Jesus on crucifix is placed in the middle of the cathedral, above the altar, for worshippers to look up to during the Mass.
Cross pendants are worn by Christians and cross stands are placed in the homes of Christians as a reminder of the greatness of the Christ's sacrifice and the spiritual salvation that humans gained as a result.
Nowadays, the use of the cross symbol has widely extended to non-religious application.  The associated meaning of salvation has resulted in the cross symbol being used to represent hospital, first-aid and other recovery and rescue services.  Hong Kong Red Cross, a humanitarian organisation, also uses a cross as its symbol. 
Over two thousand years after Jesus’ crucifixion, the cross has not only become the most important symbol of Christianity but also a key commonly-used symbol in the modern daily life.


References
1.      Wikipedia <http://en.wikipedia.org>
2.      Wikipaintings <www.wikipaintings.org >
3.      National Gallery, London <www.nationalgallery.org.uk>
4.      Gombrich, E.H., The Story of Art, Phaidon Press Limited, Pocket Edition 2006
5.      Krausse, Anna Carola, The Story of Painting from Renaissance to the Present, h.f. Ullmann Publishing, 2013





[1] Narratives of the life, teaching, death and resurrection of Jesus under the New Testament  
[3] Krausse, Anna Carola, The Story of Painting from Renaissance to the Present, h.f. Ullmann Publishing, 2013, p.11
[5] Gombrich, E.H., The Story of Art, Phaidon Press Limited, Pocket Edition 2006, p.458
[6] Wikipedia <en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crucifixion_of_Jesus> 

2013年11月11日 星期一

Art Pop

Lady Gaga's new album cover designed by Jeff Koons, with images from Botticelli's the Birth of Venus and Bernini's Apollo and Daphne. Art teacher was just talking about these two art pieces in class! How timely!

http://m.mtv.com/news/article.rbml?id=1717125&weburl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.mtv.com%2Fnews%2Farticles%2F1717125%2Flady-gaga-artpop-album-art-jeff-koons.jhtml&alt=http%3A%2F%2Fm.mtv.com%2Fnews%2Findex.rbml&cid=300

2013年11月8日 星期五

Marc Quinn @ White Cube

Marc Quinn
Held by Desire

8 November 2013 – 4 January 2014
White Cube Hong Kong